نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار جامعه المصطفی العالمیه نمایندگی گلستان، جامعه المصطفی العالمیه، گرگان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In order to interpret revealed texts, we require to adopt specific objectives, principles, rules, and methods that are known as the methodological studies of interpretation, and their resultant leads to the formation of various interpretive traditions; and of course, the theory of authority is one of these traditions. According to this theory, achieving the Divine Intention is within the framework of the plan for achieving “legal authority” through verbal principles and legal denotations (imārāt), and based on it, the common principles, tools, and methods of jurisprudence should be utilized in the field of validating interpretive evidence. This theory has been confronted with various statements, from accomplishment (munajjaziyyat) to middleness (wasaṭiyyat), etc., according to which, different views are put forward regarding its possibility of acceptance in the interpretation of the Qur'an. This article is intended to critique these views and states two important problems, the lack of legal efficacy and the contradiction with the mission of the interpreter, and to propose the process of validating the evidence of understanding and interpretation outside the discourse atmosphere of this theory.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)